We’ve been a fan of the Richardson Magazine title for some time. It is a true provocative view of nudity in an arguably non-pornographic manner. A recent interview with Style.com shed more light on the man, the magazine, and the his take on the meaning of “asexuality.”
On the difference between a “sex” and “porno” magazines: ”Do you see Richardson as a porn magazine? ‘No. We like to call it a sex magazine. We recontextualize sex; we’re analytical about it. Richardson isn’t about coming. Which is the point of porn.’ So what is the point? ‘Stimulation. Not orgasm stimulation, but stimulating debate. It’s like an asexual sex magazine.’ “